This meeting we all headed back to our original meeting spot, the comfy seats of the library, with a refreshed attitude after our long weekend away from school. In our opening discussion, the one in which we reflected upon the “Summary and Sayback” techniques introduced last group meeting, we all agreed that Sayback seemed the most useful to our writing process since the last meeting in that Sayback encouraged collaboration between the writer and the “critic” or reader. That is, rather than a one-sided discussion in which the reader gave feedback and the writer listened passively, we felt that the Sayback method of providing a writer with feedback really inspired the reader and writer to work together to improve the piece of writing at hand. Following this discussion, we moved to the second major activity on our agenda: crafting questions to guide the feedback on the new pieces of writing we brought to the meeting to discuss. We passed out our pieces to each other, silently read them, and then reflected upon the question posed by the writer. After everyone had finished reading all of the new writing, we discussed each piece individually, using the question posed by the writer as the basis of our discussion. I think all of us benefited greatly from crafting these questions before giving feedback in that the questions really focused the feedback each reader presented to the writer and kept the discussions about each of our pieces to improvement oriented critique. Further, it was especially nice to craft these questions for each other because it meant that each of us got to hear about what we most wanted to better understand versus what was convenient or easy to discuss. This being our fourth meeting together, I think we are really beginning to better understand each others’ writing styles and approaches to material and this meeting was another productive and inspiring period of reflection and discussion about writing.
Allison
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Hi ARS-
Wonderfully comprehensive post, Allison - thanks. It's helpful for me to know that your group found the Sayback component of meeting #3 particularly useful. I also appreciate knowing that the questions process was helpful as well. I think that no matter what other protocols you learn this semester, we should keep "Ask a Question" as a component of each meeting. What do you think? Also, now that you're 4 meetings in, are there feedback types you wish to provide but aren't sure how best to do it? Just let me know!
-Maida
Fifth Group Meeting --
For our fifth group meeting we headed to the Maclab so we could print out what we had worked on during the previous rotation. Unfortunately we had some printer problems, so we lost a little time getting things ready. Fortunately we still managed to get through all the assigned work. First we read the thing about voice and made sure we didn't have any questions about it for one another. Next we read each of our pieces out loud to one another. We picked out 5-star quotes from each of our papers (I didn't think mine had any but we managed). We came to the conclusion that all of the quotes had a few things in common:
They were well written and descriptive, they reflected recognizable traits of the authors (i.e. we could "hear" the author saying these things), and they were all quotes that group members could
identify with. Overall I thought it was a successfull and productive period, and reaffirmed at least my belief in the "sayback" method.
Matt
Post a Comment